Open IIoT believes that while Industry 4.0 solutions have become increasingly popular, there are still many misconceptions surrounding this technology, particularly on the subject of robotics.
The understanding of Industry 4.0 as a concept focusing on high-level digitisation and mass customisation is at the core of Kuka Robotics Australia’s country sales manager Wade Leslie’s argument that robots, and cobots, are typically deployed as Industry 3.0 solutions – not Industry 4.0 as is commonly believed.
“Industry 4.0 is largely about digitisation, which entails bringing together the physical and virtual (computing) systems, and unlocking the potential of robots and automation through better visualisation of data, increased flexibility and decision-making,” explained Leslie.
“Another philosophy of Industry 4.0 is batch size one and mass customisation. It was conceived that software and to extent, mobility, would facilitate the automated production of customised products.
“There’s a common misconception that Industry 3.0 means outdated technology, and an assumption that because cobots are relatively new, they must be part of Industry 4.0.
“However, robotics became mainstream during the third industrial revolution, and this technology is still very much the backbone of robotic automation, even when it takes the form of a cobot.”
Leslie believes that there is currently so much emphasis on adopting the latest technologies, such as cobots, that important technologies like industrial robots are being overlooked.
According to Leslie, in comparison to cobots, industrial robots offer a wide range of benefits including higher speeds, high payloads, lower costs, and models built for custom environments.
He said that historically, when industrial robots have been built into a system, they were constrained to a limited range of tasks due to the fixtures and hardware mounted around them.
However, he explained, today, enabling technologies like high-quality and affordable vision systems, improved simulation, and CAD/CAM software, combined with improved computing power, has allowed users to realise the full flexible potential of industrial robots, and help retain some of their freedom.
“Cobots also offer manufacturers some advantages due to the ease of programming, which may be important for contract manufacturers for example, and the ability to collaborate with people on tasks that marry human and robotic capabilities into one solution,” said Leslie.
“But often, cobots are being deployed in applications where ease of programming is not important, and there is no need for a person to be working in the same space as the robot, or where a risk assessment determines an external safety system is still required.
“So, in these cases the advantages are negated, and an industrial robot may have been a better option.”
Exceptions to Industry 3.0 rule and future of robotics
However, Leslie noted that both cobots and robots could be seen as fitting the aforementioned definition of Industry 4.0 when integrated with external systems, or using a high level of data visualisation and decision-making.
“An example of this would be an IoT solution where data monitoring of the robot’s performance is captured by a factory-wide dashboard, which also provides insights into the robot and the plant’s performance,” he said.
“A final scenario where robots and cobots are classified as Industry 4.0 technology, is in instances where mass customisation, or small batch production is needed, and the robot or cobot provides for high-quality production of very small batches, thanks to their ease of programming.”
Leslie is optimistic about the future of robotics in Australia, cited advancements in the development of mobile robots as one interesting area for growth.
“By mobile robots, I’m not referring to a mobile platform like an AGV or AMR, but a six-axis robot integrated with an autonomous mobile platform,” said Leslie.
“This technology will really transform what we consider possible, and lead to companies designing factories in new ways, so that large workpieces can be transported to the required processing station, on demand.”
He added that automated production no longer means production line, and that advancements in robotics will accelerate the shift towards efficient batch size one.
“When thinking about cobots, think about what functions are needed, and don’t jump straight to the specific technology – you may be surprised to find a more traditional robot will perfectly fit your needs,” he concluded.
“Make sure you talk to a robotics provider that can provide a complete range of different types of technology, to explore what’s right for your specific circumstances.”
